I’m done. Seriously, I’ve had it. I’m done with the lies and the hype and the spam and the spin doctoring. I’m done with “twitter methods” that promise thousands of followers and fame and fortune and all they really deliver is spam, affiliate marketing, and zombies – the precise thing they claim to avoid.
You want to ruin any desire you had to ever use twitter for what it is – a microblogging, communication platform? Here’s what you do:
Step 1 – find some kind of site, network, ebook, method, scam, or tool that requires you to auto-follow people who follow you. It doesn’t matter what site, network, ebook, method, scam, or tool you choose. There’s plenty to choose from. Some are free, and some are $97. This is the single best way to crap up your twitter account.
Now why would I say it craps up your account? Isn’t it required to send Direct Messages to people on twitter to follow them? Doesn’t that hinder communication?
You want to know what hinders communication? Not being able to read the stuff that I actually wanted to read to begin with. Having to dig through line after line after line of bile I don’t care about, and retweeted links I saw 2 hours ago. Having to filter through teeth whitening, and auto-fed links from Google Alerts that probably the twitter user in question hasn’t even read. You want to know what hinders communication? Being auto-DM’d shite links for more affiliate crap, scams, networks, ebooks, tools, and twitter methods that require me to join their network or buy their book. Not being able to even look at my own DMs and creating a rule in Outlook to auto-delete all DMs that aren’t a message from TrueTwit to verify my identity, because the alternative is hundreds of emails a day for garbage I don’t care about. That hinders communication. Not able to send a DM? @mention me and deal.
That brings me to Step 2 on how to ruin your twitter experience.
Step 2 – Auto DM your new followers. What better way to make your twitter experience miserable than to spread some misery of your own? Here’s a clue: no one likes auto-DMs. The whole world of twitter has turned into a den of con-jobs, marketers, and spam, and the whole auto-DM thing basically ruins Direct Messaging as a whole. The solution? Stop following stupid people. I propose that from now on, anyone who auto-DMs anyone else is instantly unfollowed. Honestly, I don’t care what you have to say if what you have to say is forced on me in a Direct Message. Now, some people just say Hi in an auto-DM, and those people I may be able to tolerate. Maybe. But if there’s [co]http://anythingatall[de] I don’t care, you go into the fecking trash bin. If I followed you, probably I looked at your home url and thought you were cool, but if you are going to send me the same url I already know – or worse, send me your affiliate coded link to whatever-the-crap you’re selling – you’re on a fast track to my shit list. And honestly, I should make a shit list, now that twitter’s added lists…
Step 3 – follow a whole bunch of people you don’t really care about. Now why would you do this? Simple: because some twitter method told you to. Or because some site or network that guarantees hundreds or even thousands of followers requires it. If you don’t care what they have to say, why bother? So what’s the definition of “someone you don’t really care about”? Well, one trick is to go into someone’s follower list who you do care about, and follow all of their recent followers. You know nothing about any of these people, whether they’re robots, humans, porn, or spam, you just click click clickety-click through page after page after page until you’ve capped out your maximum number of users you can follow in a day. Effing fantastic, sounds like a great way to waste a half hour. While you’re at it, you might as well try to scoop out your eyeballs with a spoon, pour some mustard on them, and eat them for breakfast for all the good either of those things will do you.
Here’s the thing: twitter is all about communication and sharing. At its best, it opens up a channel to communicate globally about topics you’re interested in, with people you would never have known about otherwise. As such, it comes down to Dunbar’s number: 150. You honestly can’t keep up with a whole lot more than 150 people and have a real, engaging, two-way dialog with those people. It’s been proven in studies that Facebook users with hundreds of friends really only actually keep in touch with a small handful. Our brain just can’t handle relationships in excess of a few dozen.
So, with twitter, if you are following a ton of people, into the thousands, your twitter stream becomes an unreadable landfill of refuse that never ends. There’s no conversation, only chaos, and amidst the chaos is spam and ads and affiliate marketing and crap. Sure, about 50% of those thousands of people (maybe more, but it’s always been roughly 1:2 when I’ve tested this theory) will give you a reciprocal follow, but who cares? It’s just a number, it doesn’t mean anything. Most of those reciprocal follows are from auto-following zombies like you’ve made yourself into.
There are those that will say that the numbers mean everything. That it’s all about the numbers, and the content doesn’t even matter. That once you hit a magic twitter number, say 10,000, you’re set. You can advertise anything, blog anything, sell anything, and have enough people click it that you can make a decent living off it. Even if only 1% of your followers click on your links or ads, that 1% still amounts to 100 people, and that still equates to a lot of traffic/money.
The reality is this theory is bullshit.
No, really, it’s bullshit.
I say this as someone who’s tested and used one of these fabulous “twitter methods” for several months. Let me give you a little comparison. I have our business website [ap]. [ap] has a twitter account @ArcanePalette. I ran through the steps of setting up the “twitter method” on @ArcanePalette for about a week and stopped shy of adding 1000+ people to follow. I probably got to 800 or so that I was following, and quit. I left the account sit, and gradually the follower (and following) numbers exceeded 1000 because I was doing reciprocal follows. The twitter stream was unreadable, but it didn’t matter because I had other accounts (namely @jazzs3quence) that I actually read. I didn’t pay much attention to who ended up following @ArcanePalette.
On the other side I set up several different twitter accounts that all ultimately directed to jazzsequence.com. At the beginning, they were pointing to the home page, and then later they were directing traffic to specific pages reviewing (with my fabulous affiliate link embedded) aforementioned “twitter method”. In total, I only set up about 4 or 5 accounts but I got each one to 1000 followers before moving on and creating a new account. I tried every trick that all of the supporters of the “twitter method” said to do: automated tweets with my affiliate link to sell copies of it, automated tweets by feeding links via twitterfeed, I even made myself sound important like I was actually getting sales (although never actually lying and saying it outright. I’m sure some will say that was my problem). With 1 account at over 3000 followers, 3 accounts at over 1000 followers each, and 1 account with several hundred (because I stopped mid-week) all pumping links and ads and trackbacks to my site, you’d think that eventually I’d get a single affiliate sale. Nope. Not a one. If there are people with 10,000 followers saying they can make hundreds or even thousands of dollars a day getting 9 or 10 sales everyday, you’d assume with a combined total nearing 7,000 followers that I’d get at least one. In six months.
It’s a lie: no one’s selling anything. Or not at the scale they say they are.
And what do I get in return? At first, just looking at numbers, I compared the growth of my twitter followers to the increase in traffic to my blog. I figured, even if the sales didn’t come, whatever, I’m not a salesman and I don’t want to be. But traffic is good both for my site and [ap], and if it helped to generate traffic to either of those places, then that would help me/us get a higher Google PageRank (secret: it didn’t). Sure, the hits to my blog increased steadily, roughly in line with the twitter numbers. But on the other hand, there’s @ArcanePalette, doing none of the spam, only occasional autofed (and dare I say relevant) design links from blogs I follow and respect, and then a feed for new posts on our website. [ap] gets more traffic by a significant margin by using none of the sneaky tricks to grab people from twitter. Sure, twitter is one of the biggest sources of links to jazzsequence.com, but the average time on the site is generally under a minute, wheras the average time on arcanepalette.com ranges from 4-9 minutes. The majority of people who land on jazzsequence.com couldn’t give a crap about me or my site, not really, regardless of how I got them there, so that increase in numbers really just amounts to two things: Jack. Shit. (I guess that really counts as just one thing.) if I get 50% or more of my traffic to jazzsequence.com from twitter, but all of it is just a brief glance, wheras I get actual, quality traffic from Google, design sites, and various other places (including, occasionally, twitter), then I could care less about the 30 second traffic from twitter, I really could.
Sure, there might be some great people in the midst of the hundreds of people a day I’m meant to follow according to the “twitter method” but how would I ever know? Only luck would allow me to actually notice one of their tweets in between br.it.ney fu.ck.ed and “whiten your teeth now”.
I’m not the first person to say that automatically reciprocating all follows is a bad idea. And probably, if all you want to do is set up hundreds of twitter accounts selling affiliate products and cumulatively generating thousands of links, a fraction of a percentage of which actually result in sales, then using one of these wonderful twitter methods is great for you. But if you actually want to use twitter as a social networking application, engage with people, & learn things you didn’t know before, then following someone else’s rules for how to use twitter is a surefire way to make you hate everything about twitter and not use it the way it was meant to be used.
And how is it meant to be used? However the hell you want to use it. the rules are there are no rules. It’s like a dance – it’s a fledgling technology that has adapted to the way the users have used it and the users adapt to the changes the technology implements based on how it’s used.
Take it from someone who went around the block and finally came back home and wondered what the fuck was I thinking? If I’m doomed to obscurity with this blog because I didn’t completely sell out and start posting porn to boost my traffic numbers, then into obscurity I go. I’ve got better things to do than to waste another minute on one guy’s dream to put more cash into his own pocket at any cost.
Thanks, Steffan. It makes me happy to get your seal of approval, so to speak ;)
Should get a pingback from my blog shortly :) . Really encouraged that this crap is being exposed for the lies and hype it really is.
Keep making the world a better place
My recent post Play With Fire – Get Burnt
Right on. :)
thanks allison. i'm sure i don't deserve such high praise…but i'll take it anyway :)
My recent post How not to use Twitter
Yep. That pretty much says it all really.
My recent post Twitterlating
I have wondered why you affiliate guys in the USA haven't hit the FTC up under their new rules to get some clarification on the claims being made. I know it's not a USA thing to get "the man" involved, but you seem to be covered by some cool legislation there that others around the world are not.
My recent post Play With Fire – Get Burnt
probably because us yanks aren't aware of the tools we have at our fingertips?
A million hoorays for this article. Well done to all for being like the little boy in The Emperor's New Clothes.
Maybe something constrictive can be eaten out of this tale, which is the lesson that if something looks 'professional' and some expensive fonts have been bought and the like, people will be more inclined to believe that it is indeed somehow different to and better than the usual internet marketing cockshite.
There are probably other weird things, if not exactly war crimes, to be uncovered, but I certainly can't be bothered and it looks like they've been addressed elsewhere already.
My recent post Look and listen
thanks for the props @hairyegg — i know you, @nearjones and i all had direct interaction with the particular individual in question, so it's nice to know there's a few more of "us" on the side vs. "them."
there definitely are some juicy things to be uncovered & i've found some of it, but i'm debating whether i want to use this blog to reveal them…seems like sinking down to the same level just to grab some traffic.
My recent post teh s3quence 009: lilah’s mix
This post is full of win. Sorry you had to go through all that, but I'm glad you spoke out against it.
I though that the article was spot on on Twitter spam.
I was also reading about follower spam
My recent post Let’s resist the temptation to make the Bard a Papist
nice article. it really is tragic when organizations think that numbers == credibility. luckily, i think people are catching on. that trick was so 2009.